<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" >
   <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://lawbuild.webnode.com/rss/building-contracts1.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
      <title><![CDATA[Building contracts - ]]></title>
      <link>http://lawbuild.webnode.com</link>
      <language>en</language>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 15:29:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 15:29:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Building contracts]]></category>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      <generator>Rubicus v2.0</generator>
      <managingEditor><![CDATA[david.lewis@lawbuild.co.uk (David Lewis)]]></managingEditor>
      <webMaster><![CDATA[david.lewis@lawbuild.co.uk (David Lewis)]]></webMaster>
      <item>
         <title><![CDATA[Desirable amendments to JCT building contracts]]></title>
         <link>http://lawbuild.webnode.com/news/desirable-amendments-to-jct-building-contracts/</link>
         <description><![CDATA[This analysis by David Lewis comprises a table listing (in order of importance, in the author's view) clauses in the JCT design and build contract (DB) which need amendment and the risks which the client runs if they are not amended.&#160; Most of the analysis can be applied equally to other JCT standard forms, (allowing of course for differences in clause numbering and wording).
Desirable amendments to JCT building contracts.doc (140 kB)]]></description>
         <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 15:29:00 +0100</pubDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://lawbuild.webnode.com/news/desirable-amendments-to-jct-building-contracts/</guid>
         <category>Building contracts</category>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
